Which of the following systems is effective for describing irregularly shaped parcels of land?

The Metes and Bounds system is particularly effective for describing irregularly shaped parcels of land due to its flexibility and detailed approach. This method relies on physical features, landmarks, and specific measurements in degrees and distances to outline boundaries.

Unlike the Lot and Block system, which is primarily used for subdivided land, or the Rectangular Survey System, which employs a grid-like structure more suited for rectangular plots, Metes and Bounds can accurately accommodate any shape or dimension by allowing surveyors to delineate property lines based on existing natural features or constructed markers. It utilizes a direction (bearing) and distance from one point to another, making it ideal for areas where traditional grid systems do not apply effectively.

In cases where land is uniquely configured, such as along shorelines or within hilly terrains, Metes and Bounds ensures precision and clarity in property descriptions, making it the most appropriate choice for irregular parcels.