Which of the following best describes a metes and bounds system?

The metes and bounds system is best described as a method that utilizes distance, directions, and reference points to define the boundaries of a piece of land. This system has its origins in English land surveying practices and is particularly valuable for land that is irregularly shaped or when precise delineation is required.

In metes and bounds, "metes" refers to the measures used in the description, often involving linear measurements, while "bounds" indicates the boundaries or landmarks that help in defining the property. A surveyor will typically start at a known point, like a survey marker, and then provide specific distances and angles to describe the perimeter of the property, creating a clear and understandable picture of the area in question. This technique allows for a highly accurate and tailored description that can accommodate various terrains and geographies.

The other choices miss this particularity: a linear description would suggest a simpler, one-dimensional view of properties, not capturing the complexity involved in the metes and bounds method; a grid pattern aligns with systems like the rectangular survey system, which is distinctly different; and a numerical method could imply a more abstract or mathematical approach that does not convey the physical and spatial relationships highlighted in metes and bounds descriptions.