Which method of land description is typically not used for rural lands?

The lot and block system is typically not used for rural lands because it is primarily designed for urban or suburban areas where land is divided into plots or lots that can be easily referenced by a unique identifier in a subdivision. This method relies on a specific layout that is established in a recorded plat map, making it suitable for densely populated or developed regions where land parcels are smaller and more precisely defined.

In contrast, the metes and bounds system and the rectangular survey system are more commonly used for rural lands. The metes and bounds method describes land by its boundaries and distances, which can accommodate the irregular shapes often found in rural properties. The rectangular survey system gives a broader framework for land division by creating parcels based on a grid system; this is also appropriate for larger rural tracts.

Consequently, while the other two methods are applicable to rural land descriptions and offer flexibility for diverse terrains, the lot and block system's nature makes it less relevant in those contexts.